🚨🚨BREAKING NEWS:‼️ VAR controversy strikes again against Manchester United F.C.! The The Football Association have released an official statement on the Amad Diallo penalty incidents, with Professional Game Match Officials Limited forced to apologise for THREE incorrect VAR decisions made during the match. THIS KEEPS HAPPENING TO MANCHESTER UNITED 😤

Apology or Explanation? The Truth Behind the PGMOL “Statement” After Bournemouth Draw

The “Breaking News” reports claiming that the PGMOL has officially apologized to Manchester United for “three incorrect VAR decisions” have sent the fanbase into a frenzy this Saturday morning. Following the chaotic 2-2 draw at the Vitality Stadium, here is the factual breakdown of where the club stands with the refereeing body.

Fact Check: Has the PGMOL Apologized?

As of Saturday, March 21, 2026, the PGMOL has not issued an official apology to Manchester United.

The Reality: Instead of an admission of guilt, the Premier League Match Centre released a series of technical explanations during and after the match. They defended the decision to deny Amad Diallo a penalty, stating the VAR (Craig Pawson) deemed the contact from Adrien Truffert was “not sufficient for a foul.”
+1

The formal Complaint: Rather than receiving an apology, Manchester United are the ones taking action. Director of Football Jason Wilcox is reportedly preparing a formal grievance to be filed with PGMOL chief Howard Webb today. The club will specifically challenge the lack of consistency between the Amad snub and the Harry Maguire red card.

The “Three Incidents” Under Review

The “three incorrect decisions” mentioned in viral posts actually refer to the three moments United are highlighting in their formal complaint:

Amad Diallo Penalty (67’): United argue this was a “clear and obvious” error, as Truffert used two hands to pull Amad down.

The “Two-Goal Swing”: Because Bournemouth scored their first equalizer just 27 seconds after the Amad incident, United argue the VAR failure directly caused a goal at the other end.

Added Time (99’): United officials are reportedly “furious” and will ask for a breakdown of how 9 minutes of stoppage time was calculated, which they believe was excessive.

Carrick: “An Apology is Irrelevant”

Interim manager Michael Carrick has already pre-emptively dismissed the idea of a “forced apology.” Speaking in his post-match press conference, he made his stance clear:

“Whether they apologise or don’t, it’s done now. You can have all the conversations in the world… but an apology doesn’t give us back the two points. One of those decisions [Amad vs. Maguire] must be wrong. It’s astonishing.”

What Happens Next?

While an official apology (like the ones famously given to Liverpool or Wolves in previous seasons) remains a possibility once Howard Webb reviews the footage, it won’t change the 2-2 result. United remain in 3rd place as the squad departs for the international break.

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*